<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Phusion Passenger (mod_rails): finally a good Apache module</title>
	<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/</link>
	<description>A blog of kritikal things in my life.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Hongli Lai</title>
		<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-311</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 18:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-311</guid>
					<description>Hi kritikal. Sorry for spamming, but I thought this might interest you. Passenger has been released as of today. :) You know where to find it. I don't put an URL in this comment, in fear of your spam filter. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi kritikal. Sorry for spamming, but I thought this might interest you. Passenger has been released as of today. :) You know where to find it. I don&#8217;t put an URL in this comment, in fear of your spam filter. ;)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: matt</title>
		<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-245</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-245</guid>
					<description>I'd be interested to see how it affects Apache's memory footprint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d be interested to see how it affects Apache&#8217;s memory footprint.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hongli Lai</title>
		<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-244</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 15:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-244</guid>
					<description>I'm not sure, we're working around the clock just to get this thing released. Benchmark numbers may be released at the same time or after the public release. But according to the benchmarks we've done so far, performance is on par with Mongrel behind mod_proxy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure, we&#8217;re working around the clock just to get this thing released. Benchmark numbers may be released at the same time or after the public release. But according to the benchmarks we&#8217;ve done so far, performance is on par with Mongrel behind mod_proxy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: kritikal</title>
		<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-243</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-243</guid>
					<description>Fair enough! I am, as I'm sure a lot of people are, itching to get our hands on it! Any chance we'll see some performance/memory usage numbers before the official release?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fair enough! I am, as I&#8217;m sure a lot of people are, itching to get our hands on it! Any chance we&#8217;ll see some performance/memory usage numbers before the official release?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Hongli Lai</title>
		<link>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-242</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:09:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.kritikal.com/2008/03/27/phusion-passenger-mod_rails-finally-a-good-apache-module/#comment-242</guid>
					<description>&lt;I&gt;"It’s not yet available, which I’m still failing to understand why"&lt;/I&gt;

It's because we want the first release to be perfectly stable. :) We do not intend on releasing a half-assed may-or-may-not-work product. You can expect a quality release.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><I>&#8220;It’s not yet available, which I’m still failing to understand why&#8221;</I></p>
<p>It&#8217;s because we want the first release to be perfectly stable. :) We do not intend on releasing a half-assed may-or-may-not-work product. You can expect a quality release.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
